Intubation Failure During Gastroscopy: Incidence, Predictors and Follow-Up Findings

Authors

  • Keith Siau Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley; JAG Quality Assurance Department, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom
  • Jessie Li Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
  • Neil C. Fisher Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
  • Chris J.J. Mulder Hepatogastroenterologie VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Sauid Ishaq Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom; Birmingham City University, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.264.isq

Keywords:

Intubation failure, gastroscopy, pharyngeal

Abstract

Background: Intubation failure (IF) occurs when an endoscopist is unable to progress via the oropharynx into the upper oesophagus. Aim: To assess incidence and aetiology of IF and predictors of structural pharyngeal abnormalities in patients with IF.
Methods: All gastroscopies (n=26,130) performed in our centre, between August 2010 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Barium radiology and repeat gastroscopy findings were evaluated for structural causes of IF. Patients were categorised into ‘failure to tolerate’ and ‘failure to progress’ based on endoscopy reports.
Results: The incidence of IF was 0.95%. Rates of IF varied with endoscopist specialty (p=0.021), but not with patient age, sex or sedation dose. Among cases of IF, structural pharyngeal abnormalities were detected on barium radiology in 28.9%, consisting of cricopharyngeal hypertrophy and/or Zenker’s diverticulum in 73.2%. ‘Failure to progress’ predicted pharyngeal pathology in 55.6%. Predictors of structural causes on barium radiology following IF included: age ≥65 (OR 4.0, 95% CI: 1.8-8.9, p<0.001); indication of dysphagia (OR 5.5, 95% CI: 2.5-11.8, p<0.001), and failure of endoscopic progression (OR 5.2, 95% CI: 2.3-12.0, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Patients with IF should be investigated owing to the high risk of underlying pathology, particularly if associated with age ≥65, dysphagia, and failure of endoscopic progression. We propose that IF rates of <1% could be used as a quality indicator in gastroscopy. .
Abbreviations: ASGE: Association for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; CI: Confidence interval; CP: Cricopharyngeus; CPH: Cricopharyngeal hypertrophy; FESD: Flexible endoscopic septum division; GRS: Global rating scale; IF: Intubation failure; JAG: Joint Advisory Group for gastrointestinal endoscopy; NME: Non-medical endoscopist; OR: Odds ratio; SI: Successful intubation; ZD: Zenker’s diverticulum.

   

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

1.
Siau K, Li J, Fisher NC, Mulder CJ, Ishaq S. Intubation Failure During Gastroscopy: Incidence, Predictors and Follow-Up Findings. JGLD [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 1 [cited 2026 Feb. 10];26(4):339-44. Available from: https://jgld.ro/jgld/index.php/jgld/article/view/999

Issue

Section

Original Article