Bowel Urgency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Prevalence, Psychosocial Burden, and Challenges in Assessment

Authors

  • Simone Parello Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Angelo Del Gaudio Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; IBD Unit, UOC CEMAD Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Centro Malattie dell‘Apparato Digerente, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino, Rome, Italy
  • Marco Murgiano Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Fabio Cascella Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Pierluigi Puca Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; IBD Unit, UOC CEMAD Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Centro Malattie dell‘Apparato Digerente, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino, Rome, Italy
  • Franco Scaldaferri Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; IBD Unit, UOC CEMAD Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Centro Malattie dell‘Apparato Digerente, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino, Rome, Italy
  • Daniele Napolitano IBD Unit, UOC CEMAD Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Centro Malattie dell‘Apparato Digerente, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino, Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-6752

Keywords:

Bowel urgency, Inflammatory Bowel disease, patient-reported outcomes, IBD, review

Abstract

Bowel urgency (BU) is a highly prevalent and distressing symptom in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet its assessment remains inconsistent and insufficiently standardized. Although recent clinical trials and emerging guidelines increasingly recognize its clinical relevance, no standardized, multidimensional instrument specifically designed to assess BU has been established. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the prevalence, clinical and psychosocial burden, prognostic role, and measurement of BU. It outlines key priorities for developing a BU-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO). BU is reported by 30–98% of patients and frequently persists despite clinical or endoscopic remission. BU is independently associated with higher risks of hospitalization, corticosteroid use, colectomy, and disease relapse. Reported psychosocial effects included anxiety, avoidance behaviours, reduced physical activity, decreased work productivity, and impaired health-related quality of life. Existing assessment tools do not fully capture the complexity of BU: traditional disease activity indices overlook urgency, numeric rating scales assess severity alone, and behavioral measures focus on secondary coping strategies. Evidence from trials of JAK inhibitors, S1P modulators, and IL-23 inhibitors supports BU as a sensitive and early marker of treatment response. In conclusion, BU is a prevalent, burdensome, and prognostically relevant symptom in IBD. Current assessment instruments are limited and fail to encompass the emotional, behavioral, and functional dimensions of BU. A multidimensional BU-specific PRO is needed to enhance clinical evaluation, support patient-centered care, and refine outcome assessment in therapeutic trials.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

1.
Parello S, Del Gaudio A, Murgiano M, Cascella F, Puca P, Scaldaferri F, Napolitano D. Bowel Urgency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Prevalence, Psychosocial Burden, and Challenges in Assessment. JGLD [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 27 [cited 2026 Jul. 10];35(2):255-62. Available from: https://jgld.ro/jgld/index.php/jgld/article/view/6752

Issue

Section

Reviews