Fecal Microbiome Transplantation for Recurrent CDI: Treatment Efficacy and Safety with Oral Capsules

Authors

  • Tadas Urbonas Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Dalius Petrauskas Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Vytautas Kiudelis Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Laimas Jonaitis Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Jurgita Skieceviciene Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Rolandas Gedgaudas Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Edita Kiudeliene Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Irena Valantiene Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Romanas Zykus Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Greta Varkalaite Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Ruta Inciuraite Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Elzbieta Trapenske Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Ugne Kulokiene Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Paulius Jonaitis Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Rima Ramonaite Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Justina Velickiene Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Aida Zvirbliene Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Egidijus Morkunas Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Irma Kuliaviene Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Jolanta Sumskiene Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Kestutis Adamonis Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Andrius Macas Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Kristina Kupcinskiene Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Laura Lukosiene Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Dainius Janciauskas Department of Patology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Lina Poskiene Department of Patology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Astra Vitkauskiene Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Gianluca Ianiro Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Antonio Gasbarrini Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Gediminas Kiudelis Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Juozas Kupcinskas Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5990

Keywords:

Fecal microbiota transplantation, FMT, C. difficile colitis, microbiome

Abstract

Background and Aims: Fecal microbiota transplantation is an effective treatment method for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Widely used enteric tube and colonoscopy methods demonstrate excellent efficacy and safety results. Recent data suggest that new fecal microbiota transplantation methods using oral capsules may provide a less invasive approach. In this study, we aimed to compare primary fecal microbiota transplantation efficacy as well as short- and long-term safety of two different administration routes: oral capsules and enteric tube.

Methods: This retrospective study included 60 consecutive patients who underwent fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Thirty participants received 50 oral capsules containing frozen material for a single day and 30 patients received fecal microbiota transplantation via nasoenteric tube. All patients received standard treatment with oral vancomycin 500 mg q.i.d. for at least five days before the procedure. After intervention, patients were followed up for at least six months. Data on Clostridioides difficile infection recurrences and health status were collected and analyzed.

Results: The oral capsules group consisted of 30 patients. Among them, 22 (73.3%) participants experienced resolution of symptoms after a single fecal microbiota transplantation, while eight (26.7%) patients developed recurrent diarrhea within eight weeks. The other 30 patients received treatment via nasoenteric tube. Among them, 24 (80%) patients were cured after a single fecal microbiota transplantation, while six (20%) experienced recurrent disease within eight weeks. The primary efficacy did not show significant differences between the two groups (p=0.85). Throughout the follow-up period, no serious adverse events or fecal microbiota transplantation related deaths were reported in both groups.

Conclusions: Fecal microbiota transplantation with frozen oral capsules is a safe, less invasive method with comparable efficacy to nasoenteric administration route.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28

How to Cite

1.
Urbonas T, Petrauskas D, Kiudelis V, Jonaitis L, Skieceviciene J, Gedgaudas R, Kiudeliene E, Valantiene I, Zykus R, Varkalaite G, Inciuraite R, Trapenske E, Kulokiene U, Jonaitis P, Ramonaite R, Velickiene J, Zvirbliene A, Morkunas E, Kuliaviene I, Sumskiene J, Adamonis K, Macas A, Kupcinskiene K, Lukosiene L, Janciauskas D, Poskiene L, Vitkauskiene A, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A, Kiudelis G, Kupcinskas J. Fecal Microbiome Transplantation for Recurrent CDI: Treatment Efficacy and Safety with Oral Capsules. JGLD [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 28 [cited 2026 May 10];34(2):199-204. Available from: https://jgld.ro/jgld/index.php/jgld/article/view/5990

Issue

Section

Original Article